Digital Defocus Vision Training Using Virtual Reality for Myopia Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial
In brief
VR defocus training cuts eye growth by 0.11 mm in 6 months
In a randomized trial of 120 children, daily 15-minute VR-based digital defocus training slowed axial length increase by 0.11 mm and reduced myopic refraction change by 0.23 diopters compared with glasses alone over six months. No adverse events occurred, but the modest benefit and its long-term relevance remain uncertain.
- Journal
- JAMA ophthalmology (Q1)
- Published
- 27 August 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Jing Zhong, Yu Liu, Tianli Peng, Jing Ma, Ziting Huang, Xiao Yang, et al.
- PMID
- 42658516
- DOI
- 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.3490
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Ophthalmology (paper of the day, 30 August 2026): VR‑based DDVT slows myopia progression in children
- Picked for Pediatrics and Child Health (top studies of the week, 30 August 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Virtual reality-based digital defocus vision training (DDVT) may offer a home-based strategy to slow myopia progression in children, but evidence is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of a head-mounted virtual reality-based DDVT system on myopia progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted among children aged 6 to 12 years with myopia enrolled in July 2024, with follow-up completed in September 2025. The trial was conducted at a single center in Guangzhou, China. Data were analyzed from September 2025 to October 2025. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to DDVT plus single-vision spectacles (SVS) or SVS alone. Participants in the DDVT group used a head-mounted virtual reality device at home for 15 minutes per day under parental supervision after an initial in-hospital training session. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the between-group difference in axial length (AL) change from baseline to 6 months. The secondary outcome was between-group difference in spherical equivalent refraction (SER) change. RESULTS: Of 120 randomized participants, 57 of 60 participants in the DDVT group (95%) and 59 of 60 participants in the SVS group (98%) completed the study. At baseline, mean (SD) ages in the DDVT and SVS groups were 9.42 (1.52) years and 9.31 (1.13) years, respectively, and 53 of 116 participants (45.7%) were female. Mean (SD) AL and spherical equivalent in the DDVT and SVS groups were 24.35 (0.81) mm and 24.40 (0.81) mm and -1.91 (1.11) diopter (D) and -2.04 (1.06) D, respectively. Mean best-corrected visual acuity was -0.04 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/18) and -0.03 logMAR (20/19), respectively. At 6 months, AL increased by 0.15 mm and 0.25 mm in the DDVT and SVS groups, respectively (difference = 0.11 mm; 95% CI, 0.07-0.15 mm; P < .001). SER changed by -0.23 D and -0.46 D (difference = -0.23 D; 95% CI, -0.35 to -0.11 D; P = .003). Visual acuity change at 6 months was -0.02 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/18) and 0.01 logMAR (20/20) in the DDVT and SVS groups, respectively (difference = 0.03 logMAR [Snellen equivalent, 20/21]; 95% CI, 0.02-0.05 [20/21-20/22]; P < .001). No training-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, the DDVT group had a small absolute reduction in AL and SER myopic progression compared with SVS alone over 6 months in 120 children with myopia aged 6 to 12 years. The clinical relevance of these differences over the short and long term cannot be determined from this trial but support additional studies to assess this intervention as a promising adjunctive approach for pediatric myopia control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07042022.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.