PPV23 Vaccination and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Meta-Analysis
- Journal
- JACC. Advances (Q1)
- Published
- 17 August 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Juan Pinilla, Zaraith Coy, Brijesh Baral, Larissa Araújo de Lucena, Nathalia Schettino Samad, Terezia Toni George Khairallah, et al.
- PMID
- 42658136
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103134
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Epidemiology (paper of the day, 28 August 2026): Meta‑analysis of PPV23 vaccination on cardiovascular events
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior observational studies have suggested that 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination (PPV23) may be associated with lower cardiovascular risk, but whether this association persists in randomized trials and adjusted observational studies remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated whether PPV23 vaccination is associated with reduced risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events, stroke, and all-cause mortality using evidence from randomized trials and propensity-adjusted observational studies. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were systematically searched from inception to October 10, 2025. The authors included randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies using propensity-based adjustment that compared PPV23 with placebo or no vaccination and reported ACS events, stroke, or all-cause mortality. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects Bayesian and frequentist meta-analyses were used to pool HRs with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) or CIs. RESULTS: Six studies, including 2 randomized trials and 4 propensity-adjusted cohort studies were included. In the Bayesian analysis, the pooled HR for ACS events was 0.87 (95% CrI: 0.64-1.14), corresponding to an 85% posterior probability of any benefit, although the CrI and prediction interval indicated substantial uncertainty. Bayesian estimates did not suggest benefit for stroke (HR: 1.10; 95% CrI: 0.83-1.48) or all-cause mortality (HR: 1.02; 95% CrI: 0.83-1.29). Frequentist analyses were directionally consistent, with 95% CIs crossing the null for ACS events, stroke, and all-cause mortality. The certainty of evidence by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was low across all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence remains insufficient to establish a cardiovascular benefit of PPV23. Further adequately powered evidence is needed to resolve the remaining uncertainty.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.