The Effect of Topical Anesthesia on the Phonation Process During High-Speed Digital Imaging Laryngoscopy in Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial
- Journal
- Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (Q2)
- Published
- 5 August 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Mario Bilić, Juraj Slipac, Matko Prtorić, Maša Mitrović, Iva Botica, Lana Kovač Bilić
- PMID
- 42654402
- DOI
- 10.3390/medicina62081505
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Otorhinolaryngology (top studies of the week, 30 August 2026): RCT shows topical anesthesia does not alter phonation
Abstract
Background and Objectives: High-speed digital imaging (HSDI) is the most advanced method of phonation process analysis. Hoarseness is the most common indication for HSDI, and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is an etiological cofactor of hoarseness in 50% of cases. Clinical practice in HSDI includes the elective use of topical anesthesia (TA), but without defined recommendations and indications for use, and a potential altering effect of TA on the phonation process has not been unequivocally proven. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to examine the effect of TA application on the phonation process by analyzing Voice-Vibratory Assessment with Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) form parameters in subjects with LPR. Materials and Methods: A total of 70 volunteer subjects were included in the study; 50 subjects who completed both recording sessions were included in the final analysis. All subjects were recorded in two modalities, with TA application (lidocaine spray 100 mg/mL) and without it, on two consecutive days. Results: By evaluating phonation process parameters according to the VALI form, we determined that TA application during HSDI in subjects with LPR was not associated with statistically significant changes in the evaluated phonation process parameters. Conclusions: TA application during HSDI in subjects with LPR was not associated with significant changes in the analyzed phonation process parameters. Further research is needed to determine the benefit of TA in reducing pain and discomfort during examination, weighed against the risk of potentially life-threatening side effects, in order to individualize the approach to each patient.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.