AdvanTIG-301: a phase III study of ociperlimab plus tislelizumab and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer
In brief
Dual PD-1 blockade with chemoradiotherapy extends PFS to 15 months versus 10 months
4 months for standard chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab. Objective response rates were modestly higher (≈68% vs 59%), and safety was comparable, though high-grade toxicities occurred in two-thirds of patients. Further data are needed to confirm any survival advantage.
- Journal
- Journal for immunotherapy of cancer (Q1)
- Published
- 26 August 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Ligang Xing, Terufumi Kato, Antonin Levy, Billy W Loo, Alexander I Spira, Jie Wang, et al.
- PMID
- 42648750
- DOI
- 10.1136/jitc-2025-013527
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (top studies of the week, 11 October 2026): Phase III immunotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy in unresectable NSCLC
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have an unmet need for new therapies that improve survival. This phase III trial investigated the safety and efficacy of concurrent ociperlimab and tislelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in treatment-naïve patients with stage III NSCLC. METHODS: In this phase III, multicenter, randomized, multiarm, open-label trial, patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC received concurrent ociperlimab plus tislelizumab and cCRT, followed by ociperlimab plus tislelizumab (arm A), tislelizumab and cCRT, followed by tislelizumab (arm B), or cCRT, followed by durvalumab (arm C) (NCT04866017). Objectives were to compare progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, time to death or distant metastasis (TTDM), and safety and tolerability for arms A versus C, B versus C, and A versus B. RESULTS: 63 patients were randomized to arms A (N=22), B (N=19), and C (N=22) prior to early trial termination. In A, B, and C, respectively, 95.5% (21/22), 84.2% (16/19), and 95.5% (21/22) were current or former smokers, and 68.2% (15/22), 73.7% (14/19), and 68.2% (15/22) had PD-L1 expression in tumor cells of ≥1%. Median PFS (95% CI) was not reached (NR) (6.3-not estimable (NE)) in A, 15.0 months (7.4 to NE) in B, and 10.4 months (5.7 to NE) in C. Median OS and TTDM were NR in any arm. ORR (95% CI) was 68.2% (45.1%-86.1%) in A, 68.4% (43.4%-87.4%) in B, and 59.1% (36.4%-79.3%) in C; all responses were partial responses. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in all patients; in arms A, B, and C, respectively, pneumonitis occurred in 18.2% (4/22), 5.6% (1/18), and 9.1% (2/22) of patients, and interstitial lung disease occurred in 13.6% (3/22), 11.1% (2/18), and 0% of patients, of which the majority of events for each were grade 1/2. Grade ≥3 treatment-related TEAEs occurred in 68.2% (15/22), 66.7% (12/18), and 68.2% (15/22) of patients in arms A, B, and C, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend toward improved efficacy when adding tislelizumab with or without ociperlimab to cCRT followed by tislelizumab with or without ociperlimab compared with cCRT followed by durvalumab; however, efficacy data were for descriptive purposes only. No unexpected or new safety signals were identified.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.