Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of influenza vaccination dosing strategies for cardiovascular protection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Journal
American heart journal (Q1)
Published
24 August 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Joshua J Hon, Tadao Aikawa, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Elliot Crouch, Masao Iwagami, Leandro Slipczuk, et al.
PMID
42636951
DOI
10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107591

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is recommended for cardiovascular secondary prevention, but the comparative effectiveness of different dose strategies remains incompletely characterised. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL for randomised trials comparing high-dose (HD-IIV), double standard-dose, standard-dose (SD-IIV), and no vaccination in adults with established cardiovascular disease. A pairwise meta-analysis (SD-IIV versus no vaccination) and a network meta-analysis comparing all four dosing strategies were performed. The primary endpoint was the trial-reported composite cardiovascular endpoint. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalisation. Risk ratios (RR) were pooled under random-effects models. RESULTS: Ten trials enrolling 131,908 participants were included. In the pairwise analysis, SD-IIV was associated with a significantly lower risk of the composite cardiovascular endpoint (RR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.90), all-cause death (0.75; 0.64-0.89), cardiovascular death (0.63; 0.42-0.93), and myocardial infarction (0.76; 0.62-0.94) compared with no vaccination. No significant reductions were observed for stroke (1.06; 0.72-1.54) or heart failure hospitalisation (0.96; 0.60-1.54). In the network meta-analysis, SD-IIV ranked highest across mortality and composite endpoints while HD-IIV ranked highest for heart failure hospitalisation and stroke, though no head-to-head dose comparison reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination was associated with lower risks of cardiovascular events, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and myocardial infarction in patients with cardiovascular disease, with mortality benefits concentrated in trials enrolling patients during acute cardiovascular admission. Higher-dose formulations did not demonstrate incremental cardiovascular benefit over standard-dose vaccination, although a directional advantage for HD-IIV against heart failure hospitalisation was observed in a single trial and requires confirmation.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.