CEUS-Guided Core Needle Biopsy Reduces Underestimation in Breast Lesions: A Prospective Randomized Study
In brief
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound cuts breast biopsy underestimation from 73% to 41%
In a randomized trial of 340 women, CEUS-guided core needle biopsy achieved 93.5% diagnostic accuracy versus 82.4% with conventional ultrasound and reduced false-negatives to 3% from 14%. The benefit was strongest in premenopausal patients and lesions with microcalcifications, suggesting a targeted role for CEUS in breast sampling.
- Journal
- Academic radiology (Q1)
- Published
- 22 August 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Xin Liu, Yuwei Wang, Yingxuan Tu, Weina Mu, Xiaoqing Li, Hao Li, et al.
- PMID
- 42632761
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.acra.2026.08.005
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Pathology and Forensic Medicine (top studies of the week, 23 August 2026).
- Picked for Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Medical Physics and Imaging (top studies of the week, 23 August 2026): Breast CEUS biopsy, surgical oncology
Abstract
UNLABELLED: RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidance improves the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsy (CNB) for breast lesions and reduces the underestimation rate, while identifying the patient population most likely to benefit from this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial included 340 patients scheduled for ultrasound-guided breast lesion biopsy at our institution between August 1, 2023, and December 31, 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either conventional ultrasound-guided CNB or CEUS-guided CNB. Using surgical pathology as the reference standard, diagnostic accuracy, underestimation rate (defined as the proportion of cases where high-risk lesions on biopsy were upgraded to malignant lesions on surgical pathology), and agreement with postoperative immunohistochemistry were compared between the two groups. The median age was 53.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 45.0-66.3 years) in the conventional group and 56.0 years (IQR, 44.8-66.0 years) in the CEUS group, with no significant differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. RESULTS: The CEUS-guided CNB group demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than the conventional group (93.5% vs. 82.4%, P=0.02), along with lower overall underestimation rate (40.7% vs. 73.2%, P=0.007) and false-negative rate (3.1% vs. 13.9%, P=0.002). Multivariate analysis identified CEUS guidance as an independent predictor of biopsy accuracy (OR 3.094, P=0.004). Subgroup analysis showed superior accuracy of CEUS-guided CNB in premenopausal patients, lesions with microcalcifications, and those with heterogeneous internal echoes (all P<0.05). Among patients with invasive cancer, the concordance rate of molecular subtypes between biopsy and surgical pathology was significantly higher in the CEUS group than in the conventional group (85.7% vs. 74.8%, P=0.043), while concordance for ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67 did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: CEUS can improve the accuracy of core needle biopsy for breast lesions, reducing false-negative rates and underestimation rates. It can enhance the consistency of molecular subtypes between puncture biopsy and surgical pathology in breast cancer patients, providing a stronger basis for clinical decision-making in personalized treatment plans. CEUS-guided CNB may be preferentially considered for premenopausal patients and for lesions with microcalcifications or heterogeneous internal echoes visible on conventional ultrasound.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.