Public access defibrillation by activated community first responders - the randomized HeartRunner trial
- Journal
- Resuscitation plus (Q1)
- Published
- 21 July 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Fredrik Folke, Linn Andelius, Annette Kjær Ersbøll, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Gunnar Gislason, Lars Køber, et al.
- PMID
- 42630735
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101420
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (paper of the day, 24 August 2026): HeartRunner RCT of community first responders, OHCA survival
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The HeartRunner trial was an investigator-initiated, randomized clinical controlled trial (RCT) examining whether community first responders (CFRs) activated through a smartphone application can improve survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). OBJECTIVES: The study compared standard care alone versus standard care with the addition of dispatched CFRs for patients with OHCA. METHODS: The trial was conducted in the Capital Region of Denmark, with a catchment area of approximately 1.9 million inhabitants. By May 2019, 15,401 citizens had registered to serve as CFRs (837/100,000 inhabitants) and roughly 6200 automated external defibrillators (344/100,000 inhabitants) were publicly accessible in the study area (2.4 defibrillators per km2).The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes included bystander defibrillation, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrival, favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge, and 1-year survival. As safety outcomes, the trial examined the potential physical or psychological risk involved for the activated CFR. The trial was expected to randomize 4188 cases of suspected OHCAs over a period of 7 years and was terminated February 28, 2026, when inclusion was completed. The full study protocol is available at www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT03835403).
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.