Skip to main content

Efficacy of non-invasive neuromodulation for chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (Q1)
Published
20 August 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Mohamed Mohamed Elmoursy, Waleed Mohammed Nemr Mohamed
PMID
42625017
DOI
10.1007/s00405-026-10541-0

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Otorhinolaryngology (top studies of the week, 23 August 2026): Meta‑analysis shows modest short‑term benefit of neuromodulation for tinnitus

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic tinnitus affects approximately 14% of adults worldwide, with nearly 2% experiencing severe, persistent symptoms that impair daily functioning. Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and acoustic or nerve stimulation, have emerged as potential therapies, yet their clinical effectiveness remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of neuromodulation for chronic tinnitus. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through September, 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs assessing non-invasive neuromodulation versus sham in adults with chronic tinnitus. The primary outcome was change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) scores. Secondary outcomes included the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), loudness measures, and anxiety and depression scales. RESULTS: A total of 32 trials comprising 1,561 participants were included. Neuromodulation significantly improved tinnitus severity at short-term, with a pooled THI reduction of - 6.96 points (95% CI - 10.67 to - 3.26). rTMS showed a significant benefit (MD - 4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 7.36 to - 1.33), as did acoustic/nerve stimulation (MD - 8.70, 95% CI - 15.81 to - 1.60), whereas tDCS demonstrated a nonsignificant effect (MD - 9.14, p = 0.10). Benefits were most pronounced immediately post-treatment and at 1-3 months, with effects diminishing by 6 months (MD - 3.93, p = 0.06). Secondary outcomes showed no significant improvements in TFI, TQ, objective loudness, or mood scales. Subjective loudness on visual analogue scale (VAS) showed a small borderline improvement (standardized mean difference [SMD] - 0.38, 95% CI - 0.75 to 0.00). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive neuromodulation provides modest, clinically meaningful short-term reduction in tinnitus severity, particularly with rTMS at dorsolateral prefrontal cortex area and acoustic/nerve stimulation. However, effects are inconsistent across modalities and decrease over time. Future studies should prioritize standardized protocols, optimized stimulation parameters, and personalized targeting to enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.