Skip to main content

Cutaneous Silent Period-Based Comparison of Dorsal Root Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency and Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal
The Clinical journal of pain (Q1)
Published
18 August 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Ahmet Başarı, Halil Can Alaydın, Mehmet Fatih Göl
PMID
42609036
DOI
10.1097/AJP.0000000000001414

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the effects of dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (DRG-PRF) and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) on cutaneous silent period (CSP) parameters reflecting spinal inhibition in patients with lumbar radicular pain (LRP). METHODS: In this prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 36 patients with unilateral LRP due to L4-L5 or L5-S1 disc herniation and chronic pain unresponsive to conservative therapy were randomized to receive DRG-PRF (n=18) or TFESI (n=18). Eighteen healthy volunteers were included as controls. CSP onset latency, offset latency, and duration were recorded at baseline, post-procedure Day 1, Week 1, and Month 1. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11), and disability was measured with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: At baseline, CSP duration was significantly shorter in both patient groups compared with controls (P=0.024 and P=0.022, respectively). Both DRG-PRF and TFESI significantly improved NRS-11 and ODI scores (P<0.001), with no between-group difference. In the DRG-PRF group, CSP duration significantly increased on Day 1 and Week 1 (P=0.001 and P=0.004, respectively), whereas no significant change occurred in the TFESI group. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that shortened CSP duration reflects impaired spinal inhibition in LRP. While both DRG-PRF and TFESI were equally effective in reducing pain and disability, only DRG-PRF modified CSP parameters, indicating a potential central neuromodulatory effect. CSP evaluation may serve as an objective biomarker to clarify the mechanisms underlying interventional pain treatments.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.