Skip to main content

Comparison of the Effect of Pyridostigmine and Sugammadex on Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Strabismus Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal
Journal of clinical medicine (Q1)
Published
27 July 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Chung-Sik Oh, Hyun Jin Shin, Seon-Ju Park, Yea-Ji Lee
PMID
42589958
DOI
10.3390/jcm15155855

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

Background: Emergence delirium (ED) is a common complication in pediatric patients following general anesthesia. Reduced cholinergic neurotransmission is closely associated with cognitive impairment and an increased risk of delirium. This study aimed to compare the effects of a cholinesterase inhibitor versus sugammadex-used as neuromuscular blockade reversal agents-on the incidence of ED following pediatric strabismus surgery. Methods: Seventy-six patients, aged 4-7 years, were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the pyridostigmine group (Group P) or the sugammadex group (Group S). The dose of each agent was determined according to the train-of-four count or ratio. The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale was assessed at 15-min intervals in the post-anesthesia care unit until the score fell below 10. ED was defined as a PAED score ≥ 10. Results: Of the 73 patients who completed the study, 36 were in Group P, and 37 were in Group S. The incidence of ED was 50.0% in Group P and 40.5% in Group S (odds ratio = 0.682; 95% confidence interval = 0.270-1.721; p = 0.417). The peak PAED scores were 10.0 (7.0, 15.5) in Group P and 9.0 (7.5, 11.5) in Group S (median [interquartile range]; p = 0.277). Conclusions: The choice of neuromuscular reversal agent did not significantly affect the incidence of ED in pediatric patients undergoing strabismus surgery.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.