Hybrid 3D-Printed Manikin for Lung Isolation Training of Anesthesia Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial
In brief
Hybrid 3D-printed trainer halves tube placement time, 100% success at two months
In a randomized trial of 29 anesthesia residents, training on a hybrid 3D-printed airway model cut median double-lumen tube placement time from 65 to 31 seconds and achieved perfect success rates two months later, compared with poor performance on a standard trainer. Skill advantage faded by six months, underscoring the need for periodic refresher sessions.
- Journal
- Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia (Q2)
- Published
- 18 July 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Ruth Shaylor, Itay Omer, Shimon Haim, Evgeny Rahman, Ron Eshel, Or Goren, et al.
- PMID
- 42586887
- DOI
- 10.1053/j.jvca.2026.07.033
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Anatomy (top studies of the week, 16 August 2026): 3D‑printed airway model for anatomy training
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if an anatomically accurate 3-dimensional (3D)-printed hybrid manikin improves procedural skill acquisition and retention for 1-lung ventilation (OLV) among anesthesia residents compared to a standard manikin. DESIGN: Single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary university medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine anesthesia residents with at least 1 month of experience (excluding those on thoracic rotations). INTERVENTIONS: Following a 60-minute workshop, participants were randomized to train on either a standard airway trainer (control) or a hybrid model featuring a 3D-printed, anatomically realistic lower airway (study group). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Skills were assessed at baseline, post-workshop, and at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was time to successful double-lumen tube (DLT) placement. Secondary outcomes included bronchoscopy global rating scores (GRS), bronchial blocker success, and time to identify the right upper lobe bronchus. Immediately postworkshop, the hybrid group was significantly faster at DLT placement (median 31 v 65 seconds; p = 0.002). At 2 months, the hybrid group maintained superior performance with higher DLT success rates (100% v 13%; p < 0.001) and better median GRS (12 v 10; p = 0.01). By 6 months, however, no significant differences remained between groups. CONCLUSION: Training with a cost-effective, 3D-printed hybrid manikin enhances the acquisition and short-term durability of complex lung isolation skills. The convergence of scores by 6 months highlights significant procedural skill decay, emphasizing the need for regular refresher training.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.