Skip to main content

Non-tourniquet strategy with high-position low-perfusion in distal humeral fracture surgery: reduces swelling without increasing blood loss

Journal
European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society (Q1)
Published
12 August 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Zhimeng Wang, Xianjie Ai, Taotao Ren, Bo Wu, Kun Zhang, Zhong Li, et al.
PMID
42584703
DOI
10.1007/s00068-026-03274-6

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (top studies of the week, 16 August 2026): Non‑tourniquet high‑position low‑perfusion strategy for distal humerus ORIF, clinical trial

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the feasibility of non-tourniquet strategy combined with "High-position Low-Perfusion" positioning in distal humeral fractures ORIF (DHF-ORIF), and to investigate its effects on perioperative blood loss, postoperative rehabilitation, and functional outcomes. METHODS: Prospective inclusion of patients aged 18-45 with distal humeral fractures, randomly divided into an experimental group without tourniquets (Group A) and a control group with traditional tourniquets (Group B). The Group A adopted a lateral position with high and low perfusion of the affected limb, and received intravenous injection of TXA (15 mg/kg) combined with continuous flushing with 4 ℃ physiological saline during the operation; The control group received routine use of tourniquets. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: perioperative blood loss, elbow ROM and degree of limb swelling. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Postoperative VAS score, Mayo elbow joint score and DASH score, and incidence of complications. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in total perioperative blood loss between the Group A and the Group B (240.78 mL vs. 228.53 mL, p > 0.05). However, the Group A demonstrated significantly reduced postoperative drainage volume and hidden blood loss (p < 0.05). The Group A exhibited significantly superior outcomes in terms of VAS scores and limb swelling, compared with the control group. Additionally, elbow ROM improvement was more significant at 2-4 weeks and 2 months postoperatively in the Group A. At the 6-month follow-up, the Group A showed significantly higher Mayo scores (89.78 ± 11.89 vs. 83.55 ± 16.29) compared with the control group (p = 0.036). Furthermore, the Group A had significantly lower wound complication rates and shorter hospital stays (7.25 ± 1.53 vs. 8.11 ± 2.34 days, p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: The non-tourniquet strategy combined with "High-position Low-Perfusion" positioning is safe and effective for DHF-ORIF. It effectively controls postoperative swelling and pain without increasing perioperative blood loss, leading to improved clinical outcomes and quality of life.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.