Skip to main content

EQ-5D Health Utility Gains with Once-Weekly Semaglutide 2.4 mg in People with MASH and F2/F3 Fibrosis: An Analysis of ESSENCE

In brief

Semaglutide improves quality-of-life utility by 0.03 in MASH patients with fibrosis

In the 72-week ESSENCE trial, once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg raised mapped EQ-5D utility by about 0.03 points compared with placebo in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and stage F2-F3 fibrosis. The gain was consistent across fibrosis stages and supports inclusion of quality-of-life benefits in cost-effectiveness models, though it relies on mapped rather than directly measured utilities.

Journal
JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology (Q1)
Published
11 August 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Margarida Augusto, Robert Bauer, Simon Clancy, Aslak Sindbjerg Poulsen, Fotis Tefos, Michelle Long
PMID
42580587
DOI
10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101993

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Internal Medicine (top studies of the week, 16 August 2026): Semaglutide improves EQ‑5D utility in MASH fibrosis

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is the progressive form of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver. It is highly prevalent, particularly among individuals with overweight or obesity, and substantially impairs health-related quality of life. Semaglutide 2.4 mg received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in August 2025 for adults with noncirrhotic MASH and fibrosis stages F2-F3 based on results from the ESSENCE trial. This study aimed to estimate the impact of semaglutide on health utility in this population. METHODS: This exploratory analysis used Week 72 data from ESSENCE Part 1, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adults with biopsy-confirmed MASH and fibrosis stage F2 or F3 were randomized 2:1 to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo plus standard of care. EuroQol 5-‍Dimension (EQ-5D) utilities were mapped from Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores using the Rowen et al. (2009) algorithm. Change from baseline was analyzed with treatment, baseline diabetes status, fibrosis stages as covariates. RESULTS: A total of 800 participants were included in this analysis (semaglutide 2.4 mg n=534; placebo n=266). Mean age was 56.0 years; 57.1% were female; mean body mass index was 34.6 kg/m2 and 55.9% had type 2 diabetes. Baseline mapped EQ-5D utility was approximately 0.78 in both groups. At Week 72, semaglutide significantly improved mapped EQ-5D utility versus placebo (estimated treatment difference 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01, 0.06; nominal p=0.0015), with consistent effects across fibrosis stages. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with MASH and F2 or F3 fibrosis, once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg was associated with statistically significant improvements in mapped EQ-5D health utility versus placebo. These exploratory findings provide utility estimates that may help to inform cost-effectiveness evaluations and health technology assessments. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: This study provides the first estimation of EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) health utility gains associated with once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg in people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and F2/F3 fibrosis. The findings are important for payers and clinicians because they demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in mapped EQ-5D health utility with semaglutide 2.4 mg over 72 weeks. These results can directly inform cost-effectiveness models and support healthcare decision-making by quantifying the health-related quality of life benefits of semaglutide using a widely accepted preference-based metric. Given the use of mapped rather than directly measured utilities and the UK-specific tariff, the results should be interpreted with appropriate caution.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.