Epidemiology and Overall Survival of De Novo and Transformed Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: A Two-Nation Population-Based Study of 1,465 Patients from the United States and England
- Journal
- Endocrine-related cancer (Q1)
- Published
- 10 August 2026
- Study design
- Unclassified
- Evidence level
- Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
- Authors
- Sunyoung Choi, Mohamed Mortagy, Ker Shiong Tan, Benjamin E White, Sangeeta Paisey, Aya Abdelhameed, et al.
- PMID
- 42573114
- DOI
- 10.1530/ERC-26-0268
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Urology (paper of the day, 12 August 2026): Population study of neuroendocrine prostate cancer survival
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a rare and aggressive variant of prostate cancer (PC) that can be de-novo (d-NEPC) or transform from prior prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) as treatment-emergent NEPC (t-NEPC). This study aimed to study the clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) of NEPC using data from the SEER and NCRAS registries, and to compare their OS. METHODS: A total of 1,465 patients with NEPC were extracted from SEER (N=990, 2010-2022) and NCRAS (N=475, 2010-2021). Patients were classified as t-NEPC if preceded by a documented PCa. The primary outcome is OS measured from the date of NEPC diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox regression were performed for SEER, NCRAS, and pooled cohorts. RESULTS: t-NEPC represented 9.9% in NCRAS and 15.2% in SEER. Small cell carcinoma was the most common subtype (80.2% NCRAS, 74.7% SEER). Median time to transformation was 4.63 years in NCRAS and 5.0 years in SEER. In the pooled cohort, median OS was 9 months for d-NEPC and 7 months for t-NEPC (log-rank p<0.001). The 60-month OS was 7.9% for d-NEPC and 4.0% for t-NEPC. In the pooled multivariable Cox regression, t-NEPC was independently associated with worse OS (aHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.11-1.53, p=0.001). Data source was not associated with OS (aHR 1.08, p=0.206), indicating comparable OS between the USA and England. CONCLUSION: In this bi-national, population-based study, t-NEPC was associated with worse OS than d-NEPC. OS for NEPC was comparable between the USA and England. These findings support distinguishing d-NEPC from t-NEPC.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.