Skip to main content

High-dose extracorporeal shockwave therapy restores shoulder motion in adhesive capsulitis after a single session

Journal
JSES international (Q1)
Published
2 July 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Wo-Jan Tseng, Shih-Fang Chen, Ting-Ju Lai, Wei-Tso Chia, Bing-Shiang Yang
PMID
42572621
DOI
10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101757

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is widely applied to manage musculoskeletal disorders, including shoulder pathologies. However, the optimal therapeutic dosage for adhesive capsulitis (AC) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the dose-response relationship of ESWT in patients with AC. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 48 patients with AC refractory to conservative management were assigned to receive a single session of either basic-dose (3,000 pulses) or high-dose (6,000 pulses) ESWT. Shoulder range of motion was assessed at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Functional outcomes were evaluated at 12 weeks using the Constant Murley score. Subgroup analysis was performed based on baseline abduction (cutoff: 90°). RESULTS: At 12 weeks, the high-dose group demonstrated significantly greater improvements than the basic-dose group in forward flexion (P < .001), abduction (P < .001), external rotation (P = .004), and internal rotation (P = .001). The largest changes occurred immediately after treatment. Subgroup analysis showed that high-dose ESWT resulted in superior gains in forward flexion, abduction, and internal rotation across baseline abduction strata, whereas no significant between-group difference was observed for external rotation. CONCLUSION: High-dose ESWT provided significantly enhanced recovery of shoulder range of motion and function compared with a basic-dose protocol in patients with AC. These findings support a dose-response relationship; however, results should be interpreted as short-term outcomes given the 12-week follow-up and absence of a control group.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.