Skip to main content

Maternal serum uric acid before 24 weeks of gestation and subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology (Q1)
Published
24 July 2026
Study design
Retrospective cohort
Evidence level
Level 3, Low (CEBM 3b)
Authors
Qinquan Cheng, Yuan Chen, Wenkai Zhang, Saijie Ma, Hua Tian, Shijie Wu, et al.
PMID
42569357
DOI
10.3389/fendo.2026.1896745

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Embryology (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This multicentre retrospective cohort study examined whether maternal serum uric acid measured before 24 weeks of gestation was associated with subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) assessed as a related cardiometabolic outcome. METHODS: We included 5,614 pregnancies from three hospitals in China. For each pregnancy, the earliest eligible uric acid measurement before 24 weeks of gestation was retained. Uric acid was analysed in quartiles and per 10 μmol/L increase. Modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimated relative risks (RRs), restricted cubic splines assessed dose-response patterns, and sensitivity analyses examined the stability of the findings. RESULTS: GDM occurred in 1,187 pregnancies (21.1%) and HDP in 275 pregnancies (4.9%). Compared with Q1, Q4 was associated with higher risk of GDM (adjusted RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.77) and HDP (adjusted RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.67). Each 10 μmol/L increase in uric acid was associated with GDM (adjusted RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.04) and HDP (adjusted RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.06). Spline analyses showed modest evidence of nonlinearity for GDM but not for HDP. DISCUSSION: Maternal serum uric acid measured before 24 weeks of gestation was associated with subsequent GDM, with a related association observed for HDP. Uric acid may complement established maternal risk factors but should not be interpreted as a standalone screening test.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.