Skip to main content

Indobufen-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal
Frontiers in pharmacology (Q1)
Published
24 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review of cohort studies
Evidence level
Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2a)
Authors
Yiheng Liu, Bin Liu, Weiran Dai
PMID
42568442
DOI
10.3389/fphar.2026.1821883

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) comprises aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. However, aspirin increases gastrointestinal and bleeding risks. Indobufen, a reversible COX-1 inhibitor, may offer a safer alternative. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether replacing aspirin with indobufen in DAPT provides comparable efficacy and improved safety in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: Six databases were systematically searched until 24 February 2026. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for efficacy and bleeding events for safety. Subgroup analyses, particularly for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, were conducted. RESULTS: Twelve studies involving 7,928 patients were included. Indobufen demonstrated comparable efficacy to aspirin in preventing MACE (OR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.73-1.10, P = 0.284). Crucially, indobufen significantly reduced bleeding events compared to aspirin (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.74, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses across ACS status and specific P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) consistently supported these findings. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing PCI, an indobufen-based DAPT regimen appears to reduce bleeding risk while offering comparable MACE prevention relative to conventional aspirin-based DAPT. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to existing limitations.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.