Skip to main content

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Explosive Power in Athletes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research (Q1)
Published
7 August 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Yuduo Dong, Beibei Shi, Chunlei Li
PMID
42566916
DOI
10.1519/JSC.0000000000005455

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

Dong, Y, Shi, B, and Li, C. Effects of blood flow restriction training on explosive power in athletes: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 40(9): 1147-1159, 2026-The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the effects of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) on explosive power parameters in competitive athletes and to identify specific programming variables that govern transfer to field-relevant performance outcomes. A computerized search was conducted across 7 electronic databases, resulting in the inclusion of 20 randomized trials involving 362 competitive athletes. Outcomes assessed included vertical jump, 30-meter sprint, change of direction (COD), standing long jump, mean explosive power (MEP), and peak power. Dependence among multiple outcomes was handled using 2- or 3-level random-effects models. The findings indicated that BFRT produced a small-to-moderate improvement in overall explosive performance (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.46). Specifically, significant benefits were observed for vertical jump (SMD = 0.52), 30-meter sprint (SMD = -0.52), COD (SMD = -0.46), and MEP (SMD = 0.54). Moderator analyses revealed that optimal results require a training frequency of ≥3 sessions per week for a duration exceeding 6 weeks. Furthermore, cuff pressures exceeding 150 mm Hg were significantly more effective for enhancing overall power and MEP, whereas pressures ≤150 mm Hg were superior for COD and standing long jump. In conclusion, BFRT effectively improves key explosive performance metrics in athletes and serves as a potent low-load strategy to enhance or maintain explosive qualities, particularly during rehabilitation or periods of load management. For optimal results, strength and conditioning professionals should fine-tune frequency, duration, pressure, and cuff width based on the specific physiologic and technical demands of the target performance outcome.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.