Skip to main content

A Mobile-Based Mindfulness Intervention for Reducing Demoralization in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: Randomized Controlled Trial

In brief

WeChat mindfulness program cuts demoralization scores by five points in hemodialysis patients

In a 6-week randomized trial of 72 adults on maintenance dialysis with moderate-to-severe demoralization, a mobile-delivered mindfulness intervention lowered demoralization scores by an average of 5 points compared with usual care, while also reducing symptom burden and boosting trait mindfulness. The results suggest digital mindfulness can improve psychological health in dialysis, but larger studies are needed to confirm durability and impact on clinical outcomes.

Journal
Journal of medical Internet research (Q1)
Published
7 August 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Xingxing Shen, Huanhuan Li, Fang Sun, Meihong Gu, Hui Zhang, Fenfen Zhu
PMID
42566776
DOI
10.2196/90324

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Urology (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease receiving maintenance hemodialysis experience a substantial symptom burden, and demoralization syndrome-characterized by helplessness, hopelessness, and loss of meaning-is highly prevalent and strongly associated with impaired quality of life. However, the psychological mechanisms linking symptom burden to demoralization remain poorly understood, and scalable, evidence-based interventions targeting demoralization in this population are limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) examine the mechanisms linking symptom burden to demoralization through coping strategies and trait mindfulness and (2) evaluate the efficacy of a mobile-based mindfulness intervention (MMI) in reducing demoralization. METHODS: Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, study 1 involved a cross-sectional survey (N=305) and semistructured interviews (n=14) among patients receiving hemodialysis to identify psychological pathways and clinical intervention needs. Study 2 was a randomized controlled trial in which 72 patients with moderate-to-severe demoralization (Demoralization Scale-II ≥10) were randomized (1:1) to a 6-week WeChat-delivered MMI (n=36) or usual care (n=36). Quantitative data were analyzed using moderated mediation and repeated-measures ANOVA, and qualitative data were analyzed via content analysis. RESULTS: Study 1 quantitative results showed that trait mindfulness negatively moderated the paths from the symptom burden to demoralization (β=-0.11, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.05) and from avoidance coping to demoralization (β=-0.07, 95% CI -0.12 to -0.01). Qualitatively, 4 themes emerged: the psychological experience of demoralization, barriers to the alleviation of demoralization, facilitators of demoralization alleviation, and a strong preference for dialysis-adapted, flexible psychological support. In the study 2 randomized controlled trial, compared with the control group, the MMI group showed significant postintervention improvements in demoralization (mean difference [MD] -5.06, 95% CI -6.92 to -3.20), symptom burden (MD -29.15, 95% CI -46.93 to -11.37), and trait mindfulness (MD 6.48, 95% CI 4.65 to 8.31). CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance coping represents an important pathway associated with demoralization among patients with end-stage renal disease receiving maintenance hemodialysis, and trait mindfulness may serve as a protective psychological resource. A tailored MMI showed promising effects in reducing demoralization and improving related psychological outcomes. These findings highlight the potential of scalable digital mindfulness approaches to support psychological care in routine hemodialysis management.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.