Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in refractory membranous nephropathy: a single-arm meta-analysis

In brief

Obinutuzumab achieves 86% remission in refractory membranous nephropathy

A meta-analysis of 12 single-arm studies (222 patients) found that obinutuzumab led to clinical remission in 86% of cases, with proteinuria falling dramatically and serum albumin rising by about 12 g/L. Adverse events occurred in roughly one-third of patients, including two fatal pneumonias. Results come from uncontrolled series, so randomized trials are needed to confirm benefit.

Journal
Frontiers in immunology (Q1)
Published
21 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Pengli Cong, Jiayang Wang, Xuanyi Du
PMID
42553309
DOI
10.3389/fimmu.2026.1880420

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Infectious Diseases (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).
  • Picked for Nephrology (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026): Obinutuzumab achieves high remission rates in refractory membranous nephropathy
  • Picked for Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).
  • Picked for Urology (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026): Membranous nephropathy meta‑analysis, nephrology focus

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Membranous nephropathy (MN) constitutes an autoimmune glomerular disorder and represents the most frequent etiology of primary nephrotic syndrome in adults. Although obinutuzumab exhibits favorable efficacy in managing refractory MN, outcomes diverge across individual investigations. Consequently, the present meta-analysis is undertaken to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in individuals with refractory MN. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed to determine relevant clinical investigations published up to November 12, 2025. Treatment effects were quantified employing the pooled proportion rate with 95% confidence interval (CI), mean difference (MD, 95% CI), and standardized mean difference (SMD, 95% CI). Heterogeneity was examined via the I² statistic. Subgroup analyses were implemented based on the geographic distribution of the study population and duration of follow-up. All extracted data were subjected to statistical analysis using R (v4.5.2). RESULTS: The present meta-analysis ultimately incorporated 12 articles (222 individuals) after applying the eligibility criteria. Concerning remission rates, the overall clinical remission rate reached 86% (95% CI: 80% to 90%), the complete clinical remission rate stood at 31% (25% to 37%), the partial clinical remission rate was 55% (49% to 63%), and the immunologic remission rate achieved 88% (81% to 92%). Obinutuzumab reduced proteinuria (SMD = -1.2, 95%CI -1.37 to -1.03) and raised serum albumin (MD = 12.5, 95%CI 9.91-15.08), while eGFR showed no significant change (MD = 3.23, 95%CI -3.76-10.21). The pooled adverse event rate was 29% (95%CI 15%-48%), with two fatal pneumonia-related events: severe COVID-19 pneumonia and pneumonia-induced respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: Obinutuzumab demonstrates marked efficacy in treating refractory MN, with an overall clinical remission rate of 86% and a low incidence of severe adverse events. This profile signifies a potential therapeutic role for this condition. However, all raw data included in this meta-analysis were derived from uncontrolled retrospective single-arm trials and case series. Given factors such as selection bias, the remission rate may be overestimated. Large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials are necessary for verification in future investigations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251231344.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.