Skip to main content

Divergent impacts of explainable AI for dermatological diagnosis on clinicians versus lay people

Journal
Nature medicine (Q1)
Published
4 August 2026
Study design
Unclassified
Evidence level
Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
Authors
Xuhai 'Orson' Xu, Haoyu Hu, Haoran Zhang, Will Ke Wang, Reina Wang, Luis R Soenksen, et al.
PMID
42552380
DOI
10.1038/s41591-026-04553-w

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Dermatology (paper of the day, 6 August 2026): AI explanations affect dermatologist diagnostic performance

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly permeating healthcare, from serving as a physician assistant to powering consumer applications. The opacity of AI algorithms makes the ability of humans to interact with AI algorithms challenging. To overcome this limitation, explainable AI (XAI) provides insight into AI decision-making, but evidence suggests that XAI can paradoxically induce bias in the human decision-making process. Here we present results from two large-scale experiments, involving 623 lay people and 153 primary care physicians (PCPs), respectively, in which a fairness-based AI model for dermatological diagnoses and different XAI-based explanations were combined to examine how XAI assistance, particularly multimodal large language models (LLMs), influences diagnostic performance. With fairness-constrained model training, assistance from an AI model that achieved balanced performance across skin tones improved final diagnostic accuracy and reduced skin-tone-related performance disparities among both lay people and PCPs. In this setting, LLM explanations yielded divergent effects: lay users showed higher automation bias-accuracy was boosted when the diagnoses provided by the AI model were correct but was reduced when the model erred-whereas experienced PCPs remained resilient, benefiting irrespective of the AI model's accuracy. In addition, presenting the AI model's diagnosis before human decision-making may lead to stronger anchoring bias. These findings highlight XAI's varying impacts based on human expertise and the timing of when the AI-based prediction is provided, underscoring the concept that LLMs can act as a 'double-edged sword' in medical AI and informing future human-AI collaborative system design.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.