Skip to main content

Acceptance and commitment therapy for insomnia: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal
Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (Q1)
Published
3 August 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Douglas Barroso, Natanael de Paula Portilho, Alicja Garbacka-Struzik, Diogo Carrazzoni Godoi, Maurício Prätzel Ellwanger, Thaís Pereira Mendes, et al.
PMID
42547685
DOI
10.1007/s44470-026-00125-4

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for insomnia compared with waitlist/standard control conditions and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. We searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing ACT or ACT-based interventions with non-ACT conditions in patients with insomnia. Continuous outcomes were pooled using a restricted maximum likelihood random-effects model on R. RESULTS: ACT showed moderate-to-large improvement in insomnia symptom severity compared with waitlist/standard controls (SMD - 0.67, 95% CI - 1.08 to - 0.25). We observed no significant difference in insomnia severity between ACT and CBT-I at posttreatment (SMD 0.21, 95% CI - 0.02 to 0.43) or at 6-month follow-up (SMD 0.14, 95% CI - 0.15 to 0.42). CBT-I showed significant improvement in remission (ISI < 8 at posttreatment) compared to ACT at posttreatment (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.98), but not at follow-up (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.29). Treatment response rates (> 7-point ISI reduction) did also not differ significantly. Compared with waitlist/standard control, ACT produced a small-to-moderate reduction in depression (SMD - 0.34, 95% CI - 0.57 to - 0.12) and anxiety symptoms (SMD - 0.42, 95% CI - 0.67 to - 0.17). CONCLUSION: ACT can be an efficacious treatment for insomnia with particularly strong outcomes for its psychological symptoms. Nevertheless, CBT-I remains the gold standard due to its more extensive and consistent evidence base.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.