Skip to main content

Precision of neuromuscular monitoring in paediatric patients: a randomised prospective agreement study of kinemyography and electromyography

Journal
British journal of anaesthesia (Q1)
Published
31 July 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Flora T Scheffenbichler, Magdalena Marb, Bernhard Ulm, Anna S Scholze, Sebastian F N Bode, Bettina Jungwirth, et al.
PMID
42538250
DOI
10.1016/j.bja.2026.06.016

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Neonatology (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026): Randomised agreement study of neuromuscular monitoring

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring in children remains challenging, particularly in weight and age categories without equipment certification. The study compared the precision of kinemyography and electromyography in children <5 yr of age. METHODS: Sixty-four children were stratified into neonates (≤44 weeks postmenstrual age), infants (44-58 weeks postmenstrual age), toddlers (>58 weeks postmenstrual age to ≤2 yr), and children (2-5 yr). Kinemyography and electromyography were applied to contralateral arms. Primary endpoints were precision of train-of-four ratios before rocuronium administration and after assumed complete recovery (i.e. after sugammadex administration). Precision was quantified using the repeatability coefficient, indicating the range within which a repeated train-of-four ratio is with 95% probability. A low repeatability coefficient indicates high precision. RESULTS: Median repeatability coefficients were 0.06 [IQR 0.03-0.10] for kinemyography and 0.06 [0.05-0.09] for electromyography (median difference 0.00 [95% confidence interval, CI -0.01 to 0.01]) at baseline and 0.04 [0.02-0.07] and 0.04 [0.03-0.06] after recovery (median difference 0.00 [-0.01 to 0.01]). Kinemyography precision was worse in non-certified use (<5 kg: 0.08 [0.05-0.11], ≥5 kg: 0.04 [0.02-0.06]; median difference 0.04 [0.02-0.05]), whereas electromyography performed similarly regardless of its certification (neonates 0.05 [0.03-0.11], others 0.06 [0.03-0.09]; median difference -0.01 [-0.04 to 0.05]). Train-of-four ratios <0.9 were more frequent in kinemyography than in electromyography (33% vs 16%, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Neither kinemyography nor electromyography was inferior to the other in terms of precision. Unlike kinemyography, electromyography remained precise even when applied below recommended age or weight limits. The importance of baseline values before rocuronium is underlined by the frequently measured train-of-four ratios of <0.9. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT06062290 (registered August 15th, 2023).

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.