Skip to main content

Neuroendoscopic lavage in neonatal posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Journal
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics (Q1)
Published
31 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Walter Fagundes, Lucca T A Carretta, Martín Kotochinsky, Rafael R D Oliveira, Iago N S Petry, Yasmin P Silva, et al.
PMID
42537225
DOI
10.3171/2026.3.PEDS25406

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Neonatology (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026): Neuroendoscopic lavage meta‑analysis for PHH in neonates

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) is a significant complication of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in preterm neonates. Neuroendoscopic lavage (NEL) is a treatment option. The authors aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of NEL alone for early treatment of PHH in neonates. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and the PRISMA statement. A comprehensive search of databases (PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) was conducted to identify studies evaluating NEL in the treatment of PHH in neonates. The analysis used random-effects models. The primary outcome was dependency on a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Secondary outcomes included infection rates, multiloculated hydrocephalus, and mortality. RESULTS: The authors evaluated 312 neonates from 9 studies. The pooled analysis revealed a shunt dependency rate of 58.3% (95% CI 52.5-64.2%, I2 = 10%). The infection rate was 5.6% (95% CI 1.7-9.6%, I2 = 48.4%), while the incidence of multiloculated hydrocephalus was 6.5% (95% CI 1.56-11.4%, I2 = 32.6%). Mortality was low at 2.4% (95% CI 0%-4.9%, I2 = 25.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of NEL for neonatal PHH showed moderate rates of shunt dependence, along with low rates of infection and mortality. These findings suggest that NEL is a safe procedure associated with relatively low VP shunt dependence; however, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these results and to compare NEL with traditional management strategies. Systematic review registration no.: CRD42024556947 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.