Effect of sensory-perceptual-motor training on activities of daily living and hand functions in unilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial
- Journal
- Disability and rehabilitation (Q1)
- Published
- 31 July 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Hanaa Mohsen Abd-Elfattah, Dina Othman Shokri Morsi Galal, Mohamed A Abdel Ghafar, Sobhy M Aly, Shreen Ibrahim Taha, Reem Sayed Dawood
- PMID
- 42535606
- DOI
- 10.1080/09638288.2026.2708181
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Rehabilitation (paper of the day, 1 August 2026).
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study examines the impact of sensory-perceptual-motor training (SPMT) on hand functions as well as activities of daily living (ADLs) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (U-CP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled 52 children with U-CP aged 8-12 years, who were randomly allocated to either a conventional therapy group (N = 26) or an experimental SPMT group (N = 26). Independence in ADLs, timed motor performance, and gross manual dexterity were assessed using the Katz Index, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, and Box and Block Test at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in all measured outcomes immediately following treatment (p < 0.001). However, the SPMT group showed significantly greater improvements than the conventional therapy group in all measured outcomes at post-treatment (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The SPMT program may offer a promising rehabilitation strategy for improving functional outcomes in children with U-CP and could be considered as a complementary intervention in pediatric neurorehabilitation practice. Future research should focus on larger multicenter trials, long-term follow-up assessments, and investigations of the underlying mechanisms to establish its effectiveness and optimize treatment protocols.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.