Timing of Public-Access Defibrillation for Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Cohort Study Using Time-Dependent Propensity Score Sequential Matching Approach
- Journal
- Journal of the American Heart Association (Q1)
- Published
- 31 July 2026
- Study design
- Prospective / inception cohort
- Evidence level
- Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
- Authors
- Haruka Shida, Yoshimitsu Shimomura, Atsushi Hirayama, Ryo Kawasaki, Sho Komukai, Aiko Tanaka, et al.
- PMID
- 42535553
- DOI
- 10.1161/JAHA.126.051586
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Emergency Medicine (paper of the day, 1 August 2026).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Earlier defibrillation is a key factor in improving survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Although the benefit of public-access defibrillation (PAD) has been reported, its effectiveness has rarely been evaluated considering intervention time. We assessed whether the effect of PAD varies depending on the timing of defibrillation. METHODS: Using a nationwide, prospective, population-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry in Japan between 2022 and 2023, we included consecutive bystander-witnessed ventricular fibrillation with resuscitation attempts in public locations. Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who received PAD before emergency medical services arrival were sequentially matched with patients at risk of receiving PAD on a minute-by-minute basis using time-dependent propensity scores to address resuscitation time bias. The primary outcome was 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcome, defined as a cerebral performance category scale of 1 or 2. RESULTS: After sequential matching, 1664 matched pairs were identified. The corrected risk ratio for 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcome in the PAD group than in the non-PAD group was 1.46 (95% CI, 1.34-1.59). The effect sizes by PAD timing were 1.33 (95% CI, 1.19-1.48) for 0 to 4 minutes, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.30-1.70) for 5 to 9 minutes, 1.55 (95% CI, 1.12-2.14) for 10 to 14 minutes, 2.46 (95% CI, 0.83-7.30) for 15 to 19 minutes, and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.29-4.85) after 20 minutes. CONCLUSION: In Japan, among patients with bystander-witnessed ventricular fibrillation in public locations, PAD before emergency medical services arrival was significantly associated with favorable neurological outcome, showing a directionally consistent association with improved outcomes regardless of time to emergency medical services arrival.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.