Impact of an early, graduated mobilization program on recovery and postoperative outcomes after cardiac revascularization with extracorporeal circulation
- Journal
- Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (Q1)
- Published
- 15 July 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Jiaqi Liu, Mi Jiang, Xuewen Zhao, Yingdan Liang, Ying Liu, Ruijin Pan
- PMID
- 42529237
- DOI
- 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1801971
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Surgery (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026): Early mobilization improves pulmonary function after CABG
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of an early, graduated mobilization program on functional recovery (primary endpoint: postoperative day-5 forced vital capacity [FVC]; secondary endpoints: activities of daily living [ADL] scores, handgrip strength, Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB] scores, postoperative pulmonary complications [PPCs], and postoperative length of stay) in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Between March to September 2025, 92 patients underwent on-pump CABG; after screening, 80 consecutive eligible patients (sample size calculated based on PPC incidence, n = 42 per group before attrition adjustment) were randomized 1:1 using a random number table with allocation concealment to a control group (n = 40) or an intervention group (n = 40). RESULTS: On postoperative day 5, the intervention group demonstrated significantly better FVC, ADL scores, handgrip strength, and SPPB scores (all P < 0.05). PPC incidence was markedly lower (10% vs. 62.5%, P < 0.0001), and postoperative length of stay was shorter (7.13 ± 2.36 vs. 9.18 ± 2.66 days, P = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: The early graduated mobilization program was safe, feasible, and associated with improved short-term functional recovery, reduced PPCs, and shorter postoperative hospital stay after on-pump CABG. Larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm long-term safety and effectiveness.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.