Skip to main content

Low-fat dietary pattern and dietary advanced glycation end-products intake: a secondary analysis of the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial

Journal
British journal of cancer (Q1)
Published
28 July 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Margaret S Pichardo, Rebecca P Hunt, Lindsay L Peterson, Kathy Pan, Mace Coday, Su Yon Jung, et al.
PMID
42521771
DOI
10.1038/s41416-026-03514-x

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Family Practice (top studies of the week, 18 October 2026): Low‑fat diet reduces advanced glycation end‑product intake, dietary trial

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Dietary Modification (DM) randomized trial, a low-fat dietary pattern intervention reduced breast cancer mortality (P = 0.02). Higher dietary advanced glycation end-products (dAGE) may be associated with higher breast cancer incidence. In this report, we examined whether the WHI dietary intervention influenced dAGE consumption. METHODS: Of 48,835 postmenopausal women randomized (40:60) to dietary intervention versus usual diet comparison, 40,209 had food frequency questionnaires at baseline, and serially through 5-7 years, which were used to estimate dAGE scores (kilo Unit/1000 kilocalories [kU/1000 kcal]) using a commonly referenced database. Multivariate regressions with repeated dAGE measures were examined by randomization group. RESULTS: Baseline mean dAGE scores were similar for intervention (7542 kU/1000 kcal, standard deviation (SD) = 912) and comparison (7514 kU/1000 kcal, SD = 917) groups. Through 5-7 years, dAGE scores were persistently lower in intervention versus comparison groups (mean range 5361-6236 kU/1000 kcal versus 7159-7669 kU/1000 kcal (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The WHI low-fat dietary pattern intervention substantially reduced dAGE consumption. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00000611; Date: 10/28/1999.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.