Skip to main content

The effects of sexual counseling based on the EX-PLISSIT and BETTER models on female sexual function after assisted reproductive treatment failure: a randomized clinical trial

Journal
Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology (Q2)
Published
28 July 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Akram Rahimi Shandiz, Fatemeh Zahra Karimi, Seyed Reza Mazloum, Raziyeh Masoumi
PMID
42520094
DOI
10.1080/0167482X.2026.2705428

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUN AND OBJECTIVE: Women who experience assisted reproductive treatment failure may be at risk of developing sexual dysfunction. This study compared the effects of two different sexual counselling models, EX-PLISSIT and BETTER, on the sexual function of women after an unsuccessful assisted reproductive treatment. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial included 66 infertile women, out of the 72 initially recruited following assisted reproductive treatment failure, who referred to the Infertility Clinic, Mashhad, Iran. The EX-PLISSIT and BETTER groups received sexual counselling individually in two online and two in-person sessions. Data were collected using a Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Data analysis was performed using SPSS 25 with a significance level of P = 0.05. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the total score of sexual function and the scores of subscales of desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, sexual satisfaction and pain between the two groups before the intervention (P > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement post-intervention. Their total mean scores for sexual function, desire, sexual satisfaction, arousal and lubrication were all higher than pre-intervention. Additionally, their scores for pain were significantly lower after the intervention (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sexual counseling, using either the EX-PLISSIT or BETTER model, improved the sexual function of women who experienced a failed assisted reproductive treatment.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.