Skip to main content

Exercise and Pain in Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, and Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal
Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) (Q1)
Published
27 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Victor Kornum Baccaro, Lars G Hvid, Rasmus C Jungersen, Martin Langeskov-Christensen
PMID
42507062
DOI
10.1007/s40279-026-02490-9

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain affects up to 85% of people living with common neurodegenerative diseases, yet evidence on the analgesic effects of exercise remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether exercise reduces pain in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), stroke, Parkinson's disease (PD), and Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across six databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, PEDro, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus) from November 2024 up to November 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials examining the effects of exercise (across different modalities) on pain (across different outcomes) in MS, stroke, PD, or AD. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed. Quality was assessed using TESTEX. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies were identified, of which 36 were included in the meta-analyses. The overall meta-analysis showed that exercise substantially reduced pain in people with neurodegenerative diseases compared with control conditions (- 0.83 [- 1.10; - 0.57], standardized mean difference [95% CI]). Large comparable effects were observed in MS (22 studies; - 0.63 [- 0.89; - 0.38]) and stroke (12 studies; - 1.07 [- 1.63; - 0.52]). Only one eligible study was found for PD and AD, respectively, highlighting a critical gap in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides strong evidence that exercise alleviates pain in people with MS and stroke and emphasizes its potential as a non-pharmacological analgesic strategy for managing pain in neurodegenerative diseases. More high-quality studies are needed, particularly in PD and AD. TRIAL REGISTRY: PROSPERO (CRD42024583498).

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.