Skip to main content

Romiplostim for chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia in pediatric cancers

In brief

Romiplostim prevents grade-2 or worse bleeding in 14% of pediatric chemo patients

In a randomized trial of 93 children receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, prophylactic romiplostim did not speed platelet recovery but eliminated clinically significant bleeding in the treatment arm versus 14% in controls. Transfusion volumes were also lower, and immature platelet fractions rose markedly, supporting a biological effect, though larger studies are needed to confirm benefit.

Journal
British journal of cancer (Q1)
Published
25 July 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Shivam Bansal, Aditya Kumar Gupta, Jagdish Prasad Meena, Tushar Sehgal, Rachna Seth
PMID
42502080
DOI
10.1038/s41416-026-03561-4

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Pediatrics and Child Health (top studies of the week, 11 October 2026): Romiplostim for chemotherapy‑induced thrombocytopenia
  • Picked for Hematology (top studies of the week, 11 October 2026): Romiplostim prophylaxis RCT in paediatric cancers

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced-thrombocytopenia (CIT) compromises cancer care, but data on its management in children is scarce. Romiplostim, a thrombopoietin-receptor-agonist, has shown efficacy in adults with CIT, though its role in paediatric patients remains undefined. METHODS: We conducted an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomized-controlled-trial at a tertiary center in India to evaluate prophylactic romiplostim for prevention of CIT in children aged 1-14 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), and solid-tumors receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive romiplostim (3 μg/kg-subcutaneously) or standard-care. The primary outcome was platelet recovery (≥100 × 10⁹/L and transfusion-free for 72 hours) within 3-weeks. Secondary outcomes included bleeding, transfusion requirements, chemotherapy delays, and immature platelet fraction percentagecIPF%) trends. RESULTS: From March 2023 to October 2024, 93 patients (median age, 3 years; interquartile range [IQR], 2-5) were randomized (47 intervention, 46 control). Platelet recovery occurred in 91.3% and 88.1%, respectively (risk difference, 3.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.5 to 15.9; P = 0.73). Clinically significant bleeding (≥WHO grade 2) occurred in none of 46 patients in romiplostim group and 6 of 43 (14%) in control group (absolute risk difference,-14 percentage points; 95% CI, -27 to -2; P = 0.01). Median platelet transfusion volume was lower with romiplostim (19.3 vs. 29.6 mL/kg; median difference, -10.3 mL/kg; 95% CI, -21.5 to 0.9; P = 0.06, rank-biserial correlation= 0.35). Romiplostim significantly increased IPF% on day-16 from baseline (258% vs. 47.7%, p = 0.016, Cohen's h = 2.41). No thrombotic events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic romiplostim didn't hasten platelet recovery in pediatric patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy but was associated with reduced bleeding and had lower transfusion requirements. There was a significant relative immature platelet fraction percentage (IPF)% increment on day 16 in the romiplostim arm in comparison to the control arm, reinforcing the biological plausibility of romiplostim's effect on megakaryocyte stimulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India: CTRI/2023/02/049906.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.