Comparative efficacy and safety of photobiomodulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Journal
- Lasers in medical science (Q2)
- Published
- 23 July 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Wei Xu, Jiajie Chen, Yingying Zhou, Chengzhi Liu, Yuelin Han, Kai Zheng
- PMID
- 42487022
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10103-026-04962-w
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Dermatology (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
- Picked for Geriatrics and Gerontology (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder for which current pharmacological therapies provide only modest and transient benefits, underscoring the need for effective non-pharmacological interventions. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including photobiomodulation (PBM), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), is a promising approach. This study compared the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of PBM, tDCS, and rTMS in AD. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251006868) and reported according to PRISMA-NMA. The primary outcome was global cognitive performance, assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog). Secondary outcomes were feasibility and safety, evaluated by dropout rates and adverse events, respectively. A total of 34 studies, comprising 35 RCTs (n = 1,559), were included, with one study contributing two independent randomized controlled trials. All three interventions improved global cognitive performance compared with control. PBM showed the highest estimated effects on both MMSE (MD = 3.14, 95% CrI: 1.71 to 4.60) and ADAS-Cog (MD = - 8.01, 95% CrI: -12.82 to - 3.13). In indirect comparisons, PBM was superior to rTMS for ADAS-Cog (MD = - 5.24, 95% CrI: -10.23 to - 0.12), while the MMSE comparison narrowly missed statistical significance (MD = 1.57, 95% CrI: -0.02 to 3.18). These findings were generally consistent across subgroups stratified by baseline cognition and intervention duration. PBM tended to rank highest for cognitive improvement with feasibility and safety comparable to tDCS and rTMS in AD. These findings support the therapeutic potential of PBM, and large-scale RCTs are needed to guide individualized treatment strategies, with implications for clinical decision-making in geriatric care.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.