Enteral nutrition-related hyperglycemia in critical illness: cascade conceptual model and implications for precision nursing-a systematic review
- Journal
- Frontiers in nutrition (Q2)
- Published
- 7 July 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Jiani Qian, Quanquan He, Maoyun Miao, Weiwei Ni, Yulei Ma
- PMID
- 42483648
- DOI
- 10.3389/fnut.2026.1803501
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is a common complication in critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN). This review synthesizes evidence on its mechanisms, epidemiology, clinical implications, and nursing management to support precision glycemic care. METHODS: A systematic literature search identified 45 eligible studies, including randomized trials, retrospective studies, reviews, guidelines, and expert consensus statements. Given the lack of a universally accepted definition, enteral nutrition-related hyperglycemia was pragmatically defined as blood glucose ≥7.8 mmol/L occurring within 24-72 h after initiation of enteral nutrition. RESULTS: Reported incidence varies widely, from approximately 30-47% in general ICU populations to 60-80% following cardiac surgery, reflecting differences in definitions, patient characteristics, timing, and nutritional protocols. Based on thematic integration of existing evidence, we propose a six-level conceptual cascade framework, linking metabolic vulnerability, stress-hormone activation, exogenous substrate load, enteroinsular axis dysfunction, inflammation-mediated insulin resistance, and microbiota dysbiosis. Corresponding nursing strategies include diabetes-specific formulas, optimized feeding regimens, continuous glucose monitoring, and individualized insulin protocols within multidisciplinary care. These strategies may improve glycemic control; however, evidence for clinical outcome benefits remains limited and heterogeneous. CONCLUSION: Further prospective studies are needed to validate the model and refine precision nursing strategies.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.