Skip to main content

Peripheral nerve stimulation for essential tremor: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis

In brief

Peripheral nerve stimulation lowers essential tremor scores by roughly one point

In a meta-analysis of 12 studies (914 patients, including four randomized trials), active peripheral nerve stimulation reduced tremor intensity by about one point on the TETRAS performance scale and improved daily-activity scores by nearly two points, with benefits lasting up to three months. The treatment was well tolerated, causing only mild skin irritation, but larger, longer trials are needed to confirm durability and optimal protocols.

Journal
Neurosurgical review (Q1)
Published
21 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Mark Messak, Yusof Mohamed Omar, Nada Mosad, Omar Ahmed, Hamdy A Makhlouf
PMID
42477166
DOI
10.1007/s10143-026-04394-8

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Rehabilitation (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
  • Picked for Neurosurgery (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026): Peripheral nerve stimulation effective for essential tremor

Abstract

Essential tremor (ET) is a common movement disorder; its management remains challenging despite the availability of multiple treatment options. Pharmacological therapies are often limited in efficacy and tolerability, while surgical options, although effective, are invasive and expensive. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has emerged as a non-invasive neuromodulation approach. However, different stimulation protocols, small samples, and inconsistent outcome reporting preclude firm conclusions. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PNS for ET. A literature search was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases till January 2026. The primary outcome was the change in tremor intensity, as measured by the TETRAS Performance Scale (TETRAS-PS). Secondary outcomes included functional disability, assessed by the Bain and Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) scale, clinical improvement assessed using the clinical global impression - improvement (CGI-I) scale, as well as safety outcomes. Quality assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias-2 (RoB-2) and the NIH single-arm tools. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE approach. A meta-analysis was performed, calculating the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Review Manager 5.4.1. Twelve studies, involving 914 participants, met the inclusion criteria, including four RCTs. Our analysis of RCTs demonstrated that active PNS produced a statistically significant reduction in tremor intensity (TETRAS-PS; MD=-0.92, 95%CI [-1.63 to -0.21], P = 0.01, I2 = 0) and an improvement in functional outcomes (BF-ADL; MD=-1.90, 95%CI [-2.97 to -0.83], p = 0.0005, I2 = 0). Benefits were observed immediately and persisted for up to three months in longitudinal studies. Adverse events were generally mild and limited mainly to transient skin irritation; no device-related serious adverse events were reported. PNS was associated with short-term reduction in tremor severity and functional impairment in patients with ET, with an overall acceptable safety profile, suggesting that it may serve as a middle ground option between pharmacotherapy and invasive neurosurgical approaches. However, further larger and longer randomized trials with refined sham controls are needed to confirm its efficacy, durability, and optimize stimulation strategies. CRD420261282826.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.