Robotic-assisted versus Conventional Manual Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Component Position Accuracy, Lewinnek Zone Outliers, and Early Dislocation Rates
- Journal
- Journal of robotic surgery (Q1)
- Published
- 20 July 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Greeshma Arun Kumar, Gargi Sharma, Afreen Farhana Udhuman Ali, Brahmini Arun Kumar, Moazam Ali
- PMID
- 42474847
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11701-026-03678-x
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Health Informatics (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
Abstract
Achieving optimal component alignment during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is essential to prevent long-term complications and extend implant survival. Although robotic-assisted setups (ra-THA) seek to maximize surgical precision, their definitive clinical advantages over traditional manual techniques (m-THA) continue to be a subject of active debate. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze how ra-THA compares to m-THA regarding component alignment precision, Lewinnek safe zone outliers, and early post-surgical dislocation frequencies. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials and high-quality observational cohorts comparing ra-THA with m-THA. Core tracking endpoints included mean inclination/anteversion angles, the rate of acetabular cup placement outliers outside the Lewinnek boundaries, and early dislocations (≥ 1 year postoperatively). Data aggregation utilized fixed-effects or random-effects architectures based on baseline heterogeneity thresholds. Merging data from 15 studies (2,485 procedures) showed that ra-THA significantly reduced mean deviation from planned inclination and anteversion angles compared to manual controls (p < 0.05). Robotic guidance also sharply cut the likelihood of placing an acetabular cup outside the Lewinnek safe zone (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.16-0.36; p < 0.01). Notably, this enhanced radiographic accuracy was associated with a significant drop in early postoperative dislocation events (OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20 --0.73; p = 0.004). Robotic assistance provides clear structural benefits over manual methods, ensuring more predictable cup orientation and fewer positioning outliers. This mechanical precision strongly correlates with a lower rate of early dislocations within the first postoperative year.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.