Skip to main content

Comparative efficacy of pharmacological, adjunctive, and non-pharmacological interventions across behavioral domains in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a network meta-analysis

In brief

Structured exercise cuts irritability in autism by about 1.5 standard deviations

In a network meta-analysis of 67 trials involving 4,200 children with autism, structured exercise was the top-ranked treatment for irritability (effect size ≈ -1.5 SD) and also led improvements in social withdrawal. Other antipsychotic or ADHD drugs were most effective for hyperactivity and stereotypic behavior, while combination approaches consistently ranked well across domains, highlighting the need for symptom-targeted, multimodal care.

Journal
Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health (Q1)
Published
17 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Longyan Liu, Xianyang Xin, Zhang Ying
PMID
42469874
DOI
10.1186/s13034-026-01132-2

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically compare the efficacy of pharmacological, adjunctive, and non-pharmacological interventions across multiple behavioral domains in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including irritability, hyperactivity, social withdrawal, stereotypic behavior, and inappropriate speech. METHODS: Following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines, five databases were searched from inception to March 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the comparative efficacy and ranking probabilities of different interventions across behavioral domains (PROSPERO: CRD420261368925). RESULTS: Sixty-seven RCTs (N = 4,203) were included. For irritability, structured exercise ranked highest (SUCRA = 88.0%; SMD = - 1.48, 95% CI -2.24 to - 0.73), followed by risperidone plus adjunctive anti-inflammatory agents (SUCRA = 72.9%) and neuromodulatory agents (SUCRA = 67.8%). For hyperactivity, pharmacological interventions were most effective, with other antipsychotic/ADHD medications ranking highest (SUCRA = 95.1%; SMD = - 1.85, 95% CI -2.50 to - 1.20), followed by structured exercise (SUCRA = 76.1%). Similarly, for stereotypic behavior, pharmacological treatments dominated, with other antipsychotic/ADHD medications achieving the best performance (SUCRA = 92.0%; SMD = - 1.10, 95% CI -1.67 to - 0.52). In contrast, for social withdrawal, structured exercise emerged as the most effective intervention (SUCRA = 98.9%; SMD = - 1.28, 95% CI -1.96 to - 0.60), followed by risperidone plus neuromodulatory agents (SUCRA = 75.3%). For inappropriate speech, structured exercise (SUCRA = 80.1%) and probiotics plus oxytocin (SUCRA = 76.4%) demonstrated the highest rankings, with structured exercise showing a significant effect (SMD = - 0.80, 95% CI -1.40 to - 0.19). CONCLUSION: This study establishes a domain-specific treatment hierarchy for ASD, demonstrating that intervention effects vary substantially across behavioral domains. Pharmacological approaches are more effective for hyperactivity and stereotypic behaviors, whereas structured exercise shows superior benefits for irritability and social withdrawal. Combination strategies consistently rank highly across multiple domains, supporting the value of multimodal interventions. These findings underscore the importance of individualized, symptom-targeted, and mechanism-informed treatment strategies to optimize clinical outcomes in ASD.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.