Skip to main content

Effects of e-Mental Health Interventions on Psychological Outcomes Among Informal Caregivers of People With Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (Q1)
Published
14 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Ye Luo, Xiaoyu Li, Yingying Chen, Jiali Bai, Wei Xu, Wenxi Duan, et al.
PMID
42447605
DOI
10.1016/j.jamda.2026.106321

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To systematically identify and synthesize the current evidence on the psychological impact of e-mental health interventions among informal caregivers of people living with dementia (PLWD). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining e-mental health interventions. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Informal caregivers of PLWD across multiple study settings were included in eligible trials. METHODS: Six databases were searched from inception to February 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of e-mental health interventions on psychological outcomes among informal caregivers of PLWD. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Due to heterogeneity, random-effects meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. E-mental health interventions significantly reduced depression, anxiety, and caregiving stress and improved self-efficacy and positive aspects of caregiving. In contrast, the intervention showed no significant effect on reducing caregiver burden. Sensitivity analysis showed that the effect on depression was not robust and became nonsignificant after removing one influential study. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: E-mental health interventions show promise in improving psychological outcomes among informal caregivers of PLWD, though evidence for reducing caregiver burden remains limited.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.