Skip to main content

Two-Year Retention of Benefits After Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Stroke: Follow-Up of the VNS-REHAB Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal
Neurology (Q1)
Published
14 July 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Teresa J Kimberley, Isha Vora, Steven C Cramer, Steven L Wolf, Jesse Dawson
PMID
42447422
DOI
10.1212/WNL.0000000000218298

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Rehabilitation (top studies of the week, 11 October 2026): Long‑term RCT follow‑up of VNS paired with rehab for chronic

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation improves short-term upper extremity (UE) function in people with chronic ischemic stroke. Because sustained improvements are needed for people with stroke, we examined the long-term effects of Paired VNS on impairment, activity, participation, and quality of life. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of 2-year data of the triple-blind, sham-controlled, randomized VNS-REHAB pivotal trial. After receiving the full therapeutic protocol with either real (Active) or sham (Control) VNS, participants continued self-activated active stimulation for at least 2 years. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), participation, and quality of life outcomes were assessed at multiple time points. RESULTS: Pooled 2-year outcome data were available from 49 participants. At the 2-year point, FMA-UE scores improved 7.51 points (95% CI 5.80-9.22; p < 0.001), and WFMT scores improved 0.63 points (0.50-0.75; p < 0.001) from baseline. There were significant improvements from baseline in 5 of 7 participation and quality of life measures at 2 years. Improvements were retained at 3 years among a subset of participants (n = 16). DISCUSSION: The sustained improvements in UE impairment and function for at least 2 years make this an important treatment option for a defined subset of individuals with chronic arm and hand deficits after ischemic stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov/study/NCT03131960.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.