Skip to main content

Exercise for Reversing Prefrailty to Robustness in Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Journal
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (Q1)
Published
13 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Mengli Xu, Yefan Gao, Xiaohuan Jin, Shengji Jin, Heng Zhang, Shizheng Du
PMID
42442004
DOI
10.1016/j.jamda.2026.106296

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of exercise in reversing prefrailty in exclusively prefrail older adults. DESIGN: A systematic review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The older adults (≥60 years old) in the prefrailty period. METHODS: In this systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 6 international databases were systematically searched. We employed the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCT quality appraisal. Due to substantial heterogeneity of the included studies, we did not conduct meta-analyses. Instead, for each included study, we extracted the data on postintervention frailty status to calculate the odds ratio for improvement in frailty status in the intervention vs the control group. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence bodies. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were included. It is found that professionally supervised exercise was safe and well accepted for prefrail older adults. However, on the efficacy of exercise in reversing prefrailty, the observed positive effects were primarily supported by low-certainty bodies of evidence, whereas the more methodologically rigorous evidence largely showed nonfavorable results, particularly for sustained benefits. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Given the inconsistent findings and the limited certainty of the available evidence, it remains uncertain whether exercise has immediate and sustained effects on reversing prefrailty in older adults. Professionally supervised exercise is safe for older adults; it should, however, be approached with caution as a standalone strategy to reverse prefrailty. To provide more scientific guidance for practice, we recommend future high-quality RCTs with both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, rigorous handling of missing data, and well-defined, tailored exercise regimens for prefrail older adults.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.