A systematic review investigating the safety and efficacy of intravenous iron in people with ND-CKD who are iron deficient but not anaemic
- Journal
- Clinical kidney journal (Q1)
- Published
- 8 June 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Sebastian Spencer, Megan Skidmore, Rosa Maeve McGing, Sunil Bhandari
- PMID
- 42441103
- DOI
- 10.1093/ckj/sfag172
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Nephrology (top studies of the week, 19 July 2026).
- Picked for Transplantation (top studies of the week, 19 July 2026).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of intravenous (IV) iron in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) without anaemia remains uncertain. Iron deficiency (ID) in CKD is common and associated with impaired mitochondrial function, fatigue, cognitive decline, and restless legs syndrome, even when haemoglobin (Hb) levels are normalized. ID is linked to cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and increased hospitalization risk. Guidelines are inconsistent, and the evidence base is limited. METHODS: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies involving adults with ND-CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60) receiving IV iron compared with oral iron, placebo, or no treatment. Primary outcome was change in iron indices. Secondary outcomes: CV events, infections, physical function, symptoms, cognition, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In pooled analyses restricted to RCTs, IV iron significantly improved TSAT [mean difference (MD) +7.48%, 95% CI 5.64-9.32; P < .001; I² = 0.0%] and ferritin (MD +208.83 ng/ml, 95% CI 128.39-289.26; P = .004; I² = 75.9%). IV iron was associated with a numerically greater increase in Hb, although this did not reach statistical significance (MD +5.33 g/l, 95% CI -1.18 to 11.84; P = .080; I² = 57.4%). No significant effect was observed on 6-minute walk test distance (MD +23.99 m, 95% CI -77.44 to 125.41; P = .506; I² = 83.0%). QoL outcomes showed no significant difference in the primary standardized mean difference (SMD) meta-analysis (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -1.44 to 0.98; P = .587; I² = 83.2%). Adverse events, CV outcomes and infections were sparsely reported, with no consistent safety signal identified. CONCLUSIONS: IV iron improves biochemical markers of ID in ND-CKD without anaemia, with no clear signal of harm. However, evidence does not demonstrate measurable improvements in physical function or QoL.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.