Microneedle Frequency Adjunct to 2% Minoxidil in Female androgenetic alopecia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Journal
- Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (Q1)
- Published
- 25 May 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Yinghui Liu, Huanyuan Luo, Sai Yang, Zhenyu Wang, Yangxia Chen, Fangfang Wu, et al.
- PMID
- 42190753
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaad.2026.03.123
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Dermatology (top studies of the week, 8 November 2026): RCT, microneedle adjunct to minoxidil for female AGA
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microneedling has been proposed as an adjunctive strategy to enhance topical minoxidil delivery in androgenetic alopecia (AGA), but the optimal treatment frequency remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2% topical minoxidil alone versus minoxidil combined with microneedling in women with mild-to-moderate AGA. METHODS: In this 24-week prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center trial, 245 women with mild-to-moderate AGA (Savin grades D3-D6) were randomized to receive minoxidil alone, minoxidil plus monthly microneedling, or minoxidil plus microneedling every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in target area non-vellus hair count (TAHC) from baseline to week 24. Secondary outcomes included non-vellus hair shaft diameter, vellus hair count, hair density, and cumulative hair shaft diameter. RESULTS: A total of 234 participants completed the study. All groups demonstrated significant increases in TAHC at week 24 (all P < .001), with no significant differences between groups. Secondary outcomes were also comparable across treatments groups. LIMITATIONS: Single-center, open-label design and absence of patient-reported outcome data due to database configuration. CONCLUSION: Microneedling using a 36-needle cartridge at a depth of 500-550 μm every 2 or 4 weeks did not provide additional clinical benefit over 2% topical minoxidil alone after 24 weeks.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.