Parastomal hernia outcomes after sutured versus unsutured composite techniques for specimen-extraction-site loop ileostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection: the UNSEAL randomized controlled trial
In brief
Unsutured ileostomy technique cut parastomal hernias from 13.5% to 4.8%
In a single-center randomized trial, hernias before stoma reversal occurred in 4.8% of patients with the unsutured technique, versus 13.5% with the sutured approach; stoma creation was also faster. Other complications and reversal outcomes were similar, and the trial cannot show which part of the multi-component technique drove the difference.
- Journal
- Surgical endoscopy (Q1)
- Published
- 25 September 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Jiajia Mao, Pingtian Xia, Yanlei Wang, Xiaoxia An, Yong Dai, Xiang Zhang
- PMID
- 42791407
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00464-026-13420-1
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Breast and Endocrine Surgery (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026): Ranked by evidence level and journal quartile
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Protective loop ileostomy created at the specimen-extraction site is a minimally invasive option after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Whether different composite techniques influence parastomal hernia risk remains uncertain. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer with protective specimen-extraction-site loop ileostomy. Patients were randomized intraoperatively to a sutured composite technique, consisting of fascial/peritoneal fixation without a supporting rod, or an unsutured composite technique, consisting of no fascial/peritoneal fixation, routine supporting rod placement, and creation of a smaller tailored fascial aperture. The primary outcome was parastomal hernia before ileostomy reversal, assessed by standardized clinical examination, routine pre-reversal computed tomography, and intraoperative assessment at reversal. RESULTS: Of 233 randomized patients, 216 were analyzed per protocol, including 111 in the sutured group and 105 in the unsutured group. Parastomal hernia occurred in 13.5% (15/111) and 4.8% (5/105), respectively (risk ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.94; risk difference -8.7%, 95% CI - 16.3 to - 1.2; P = 0.047). Stoma formation time was shorter in the unsutured group (median 24 vs 31 min; Hodges-Lehmann difference - 7.2 min, 95% CI -9.0 to -5.4; P <0.001). Time to first stoma output was earlier in the unsutured group (median 12 vs 15 h; Hodges-Lehmann difference - 3.0 h, 95% CI - 4.7 to - 1.8; P <0.001), although this difference was not associated with shorter hospital stay. Other stoma-related complications, reversal outcomes, and quality of life scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: The unsutured composite technique was associated with lower parastomal hernia risk and shorter stoma formation time compared with the sutured composite technique, without apparent differences in other stoma-related or reversal outcomes. Because the intervention comprised multiple technical components, the independent effect of each component could not be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06344923).
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.