Skip to main content

A Digital Therapeutic Intervention for Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

In brief

Smartphone therapy lowered motivation symptoms 2.6 points more than digital control

In a 457-person randomized trial, adults using the smartphone therapy alongside antipsychotics had a 6.8-point improvement on a motivation and pleasure symptom scale at 16 weeks, compared with 4.2 points with digital control. The added benefit was modest, and serious adverse events were uncommon and not treatment-related; whether improvement lasts beyond the short follow-up remains unknown.

Journal
JAMA network open (Q1)
Published
1 September 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Abhishek Pratap, Shaheen E Lakhan, Cassandra Snipes, Wenbo Tang, Olya Besedina, Faith Dickerson, et al.
PMID
42789268
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.35753

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Negative symptoms of schizophrenia are a major contributor to poor outcomes, yet no US Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacotherapies are specifically indicated for their treatment. In particular, motivation and pleasure negative symptoms are especially burdensome for patients. Psychosocial interventions can be effective, but access barriers and challenges in sustaining engagement limit their impact. Digital therapeutics are a novel modality that can deliver patient-centered interventions. CT-155/BI 3972080 (CT-155), an investigational smartphone-based digital therapeutic integrating evidence-based psychosocial strategies, is designed to address negative symptoms of schizophrenia adjunctive to pharmacotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CT-155 as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for negative symptoms of schizophrenia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: CONVOKE was a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial conducted between March 31, 2023, and June 20, 2025, at 66 clinical sites in the US among adults with negative symptoms of schizophrenia who were receiving up to 2 antipsychotic medications. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized 1:1 to CT-155 or a digital control for 16 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was change from baseline to week 16 in Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms, Motivation and Pleasure subscale (CAINS-MAP) score. Secondary end points included change from baseline to week 16 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale positive subscale scores. All baseline demographic and clinical characteristic, effectiveness, and engagement analyses were performed using the intention-to-treat set. RESULTS: Overall, 457 participants were randomized (227 to CT-155 and 230 to digital control; mean [SD] age, 45.8 [12.5] years; 277 male [60.6%]). Retention analyses showed that most participants stayed active in CT-155 (70.4%; [160 of 227]) or digital control (76.5% [176 of 230]) through the end of week 15. At week 16, CT-155 significantly reduced mean (SE) CAINS-MAP total score vs digital control (CT-155 [n = 196], -6.8 (0.5); digital control [n = 204], -4.2 (0.5); least-squares difference, -2.6 [95% CI, -4.0 to -1.2]; P < .001; Cohen d, -0.36 [95% CI, -0.56 to -0.17]). During the 16-week intervention and 4-week follow-up, serious adverse events occurred in 3 of 228 participants (1.3%) receiving CT-155 and 5 of 231 (2.2%) receiving digital control; none were treatment related. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, CT-155 improved motivation and pleasure negative symptoms with a small-to-moderate effect size comparable with psychosocial interventions and pharmacologic treatment in psychiatry and was well tolerated and safe, thus representing a novel adjunctive therapy for schizophrenia. CT-155 may represent a scalable, accessible option for improving schizophrenia negative symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05838625.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.