Skip to main content

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for prevention of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a graded systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal
Techniques in coloproctology (Q1)
Published
23 September 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Mahmoud Albashier, Mohamed Al Sayed, Hashem Altabbaa, Nouraldin Hih, Mario Maged, Nour Lebda, et al.
PMID
42778806
DOI
10.1007/s10151-026-03388-4

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Anatomy (paper of the day, 25 September 2026): ICG‑FA reduces leak by assessing perfusion anatomy
  • Picked for Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery (paper of the day, 25 September 2026): ICG fluorescence angiography reduces anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a major driver of morbidity after colorectal resection. Indocyanine-green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) provides real-time intraoperative perfusion assessment, but its impact across randomized trials remains debated. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICG-FA compared with conventional intraoperative assessment in preventing AL in colorectal surgery. METHODS: A systematic review and a meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, including RCTs comparing ICG-FA with conventional assessment. The primary outcome was overall AL; secondary outcomes included leak grade, anatomic location, operative metrics, and change in surgical plan (CISP). Pooled risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to evaluate evidence sufficiency. RESULTS: Eight RCTs (n = 4712) met the inclusion criteria. ICG-FA reduced overall AL versus control (risk ratio [RR] 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.81; I2 = 0%). The absolute risk reduction was 3.6%, yielding a number needed to treat of around 24 to prevent one leak. TSA crossed the superiority boundary for the primary endpoint, indicating sufficient evidence of the assumed control risk and effect size. Benefits were more apparent for left-sided anastomoses and for lower-grade leaks (A and A + B), whereas severe (Grade C) leaks and reoperation did not differ significantly. Overall complications showed a small relative reduction, but TSA indicated insufficient information size. Other safety outcomes (surgical site infection, ileus, mortality) were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: High-certainty evidence demonstrates that ICG-FA reduces overall and low-grade AL, principally in left-sided resections, without prolonging operative time. ICG-FA should be considered an evidence-based adjunct to optimize perfusion assessment in colorectal surgery. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251139372.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.