Skip to main content

A Phase I/II Trial of Anti-CD22/CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy, CART2219.1, in Adult and Pediatric Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL

Journal
Blood cancer discovery (Q1)
Published
21 September 2026
Study design
Phase 1 (first-in-human) trial
Evidence level
Level 4, Very Low (CEBM 4)
Authors
Michaela Su-Fern Seng, Zexi Guo, Kai Soon Ng, Shui Yen Soh, Francesca Wei Inng Lim, Liang Piu Koh, et al.
PMID
42765973
DOI
10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-26-0115

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Hematology (paper of the day, 27 September 2026): Phase I/II CAR‑T trial for relapsed/refractory B‑ALL

Abstract

Durable remissions after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in relapsed/refractory B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukaemia are limited by antigen escape and T-cell dysfunction. The tandem CAR22-19/LTG2737 construct links human-derived anti-CD22 and anti-CD19 scFvs to CD8 hinge/transmembrane, 4-1BB, and CD3ζ domains. In a multicentre phase I/II trial, all patients (n=11; 7 children, 4 adults) achieved complete remission by Day 28 (91% minimal residual disease-negative). At a 34-month median follow-up, median overall survival (OS) and leukaemia-free survival (LFS) were not reached. The 12-month OS was 82% (95%CI: 45%-95%) and LFS was 64% (95%CI: 30%-85%) without consolidative transplantation. Immune-effector cell-associated toxicities included cytokine release syndrome, haematotoxicity, and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome. De novo CD19 escape caused one relapse. Exploratory multi-omic profiling linked durable response to higher CD22 antigen density on blasts; pre-infusion CD4 CAR-T cells expressing IL7Rα, LEF1, BACH2, and TCF7 but lower FOXP3; post-infusion NK-like effector CAR-T expansion; and central-memory CAR-T pool maintenance.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.