Skip to main content

Comparative Safety of Common Immunosuppressant Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Target Trial Emulation Study

Journal
Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) (Q1)
Published
17 September 2026
Study design
Retrospective cohort
Evidence level
Level 3, Low (CEBM 3b)
Authors
Alí Duarte-García, Marlon J Sandino-Bermúdez, Mariana González-Treviño, Cynthia S Crowson, Rozalina G McCoy, Yihong Deng
PMID
42750573
DOI
10.1002/art.70343

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Rheumatology (paper of the day, 21 September 2026): Comparative safety of immunosuppressants in non‑renal SLE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compare infection-related hospitalization risk among patients with non-renal SLE initiating commonly used immunosuppressants. METHODS: We emulated a target trial using Optum Labs Data Warehouse claims to compare the risk of infection-related hospitalization among patients initiating azathioprine, belimumab, methotrexate, or mycophenolic acid analogues (MPAA) between March 2011 and September 2023. We excluded patients with prior lupus nephritis, solid-organ or bone marrow transplantation, or rituximab/cyclophosphamide exposure. The primary outcome was time to first infection-related hospitalization, using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for baseline covariates and fitted marginal structural Cox models incorporating time-varying monthly glucocorticoid dose during follow-up. RESULTS: Among 6,168 patients, 24-month cumulative incidence of infection-related hospitalization was 10% (95%CI 8-12) for azathioprine, 8% (95%CI 5-10) for belimumab, 10% (95%CI 8-11) for methotrexate, and 13% (95%CI 10-15) for MPAA. In ITT analyses, MPAA had higher risk than belimumab (HR 1.55; 95%CI 1.07-2.25) and methotrexate (HR 1.32; 95%CI 1.04-1.68). In PP analyses, azathioprine (HR 2.04; 95%CI 1.01-4.16) and MPAA (HR 2.27; 95%CI 1.11-4.62) had higher risk compared with belimumab. After accounting for time-varying monthly glucocorticoid dose, between-treatment differences were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: Initial differences in the infection-related hospitalization risk were attenuated after accounting for time-varying glucocorticoid exposure. These findings highlight glucocorticoid exposure as an important factor associated with serious infection risk, while recognizing that post-baseline glucocorticoid use may reflect both evolving disease activity and a pathway through which therapies influence infection risk.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.