Targeting CD38 with bispecific antibody XmAb 18968 in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- Journal
- Leukemia (Q1)
- Published
- 14 September 2026
- Study design
- Phase 1 (first-in-human) trial
- Evidence level
- Level 4, Very Low (CEBM 4)
- Authors
- Guru Subramanian Guru Murthy, Bijal Shah, Talha Badar, Jessica Leonard, Adam DuVall, Cecilia Arana Yi, et al.
- PMID
- 42736326
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41375-026-03130-x
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Hematology (paper of the day, 18 September 2026): CD38 bispecific antibody in relapsed AML and T‑ALL, phase‑1 trial
Abstract
CD38 is a transmembrane glycoprotein highly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). XmAb18968 is a novel CD38-CD3 bi-specific T-cell engager with Fc domain modified to reduce non-selective activation of effector cells. In this phase 1 multicenter clinical trial, we evaluated the outcomes of XmAb18968 in adults with relapsed/refractory (RR) AML and T-ALL. Twenty-two patients with AML (n = 13) and T-ALL (n = 9) with a median age of 63 years (range 31-77) were enrolled. Prior lines of therapy (median 3, range 1-8) included venetoclax (77.3%), allogeneic HCT (22.7%), CD7 CAR-T cell therapy and daratumumab (11.1%). Grade ≥3 adverse events included anemia (14%), neutropenia (18%), and thrombocytopenia (14%). No grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity was seen. Overall, 17 patients (AML = 11, ALL = 6) completed at least one cycle of therapy. Among 11 patients with RR-AML, one achieved partial remission (PR) and two achieved MRD negative complete remission (CR). In 6 patients with RR-T-ALL, 4 achieved meaningful improvement in disease burden with 1 clearance of MRD. Median OS was 8.5 months in AML and 8.7 months in T-ALL. XmAb18968 is safe and tolerable with encouraging preliminary efficacy, supporting further investigation of CD38 targeting therapies in this setting (NCT05038644).
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.