Skip to main content

Trastuzumab Botidotin Versus Trastuzumab Emtansine in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial

In brief

Trastuzumab botidotin doubles progression-free survival to 11 months versus 4 months with T-DM1

In a phase III trial of 365 Chinese patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane, trastuzumab botidotin extended median progression-free survival to 11.1 months, compared with 4.4 months for trastuzumab emtansine, and raised response rates from 53% to 77%. Toxicities differed, with more severe eye events but fewer pulmonary and hepatic problems, and overall survival data remain immature.

Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (Q1)
Published
11 September 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Jian Zhang, Quchang Ouyang, Qingyuan Zhang, Huihui Li, Xu Wang, Ying Wang, et al.
PMID
42727044
DOI
10.1200/JCO-26-00602

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Oncology and Radiation Oncology (paper of the day, 13 September 2026): Phase III RCT HER2‑positive breast cancer ADC vs T‑DM1
  • Picked for Breast and Endocrine Surgery (top studies of the week, 13 September 2026): Phase III trial, systemic therapy focus
  • Picked for Radiation Oncology (top studies of the week, 13 September 2026): HER2 ADC trial, systemic breast cancer therapy

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody-drug conjugate, trastuzumab botidotin, for the treatment of HER2-positive unresectable/metastatic breast cancer (BC). METHODS: In this phase III, open-label, multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06968585), conducted at 57 centers in China, adult patients with HER2-positive, unresectable/metastatic BC who had received prior trastuzumab and a taxane were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive trastuzumab botidotin or trastuzumab emtansine. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR), using an intention-to-treat analysis. In a prespecified interim analysis of PFS per BICR, trastuzumab botidotin met the prespecified superiority boundary (P < .0001). We report here the prespecified final analysis of PFS. RESULTS: Between July 18, 2023, and April 26, 2024, 365 patients were randomly assigned to trastuzumab botidotin (n = 182) or trastuzumab emtansine (n = 183). At data cutoff (median follow-up, 14.9 months), trastuzumab botidotin resulted in longer PFS than trastuzumab emtansine (median, 11.1 v 4.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.39 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.51]; nominal P < .0001). Benefit was consistent across subgroups, including those defined by prior lines of anti-HER2 therapy, prior pertuzumab or anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and visceral metastases. The objective response rate was 76.9% (95% CI, 70.1 to 82.8) with trastuzumab botidotin and 53.0% (95% CI, 45.5 to 60.4) with trastuzumab emtansine. Overall survival data were immature (medians not reached in either group; HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.38 to 1.03]). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 127 (69.8%) and 116 (63.7%) patients in each group, respectively. Ocular treatment-related adverse events had a high incidence with trastuzumab botidotin; however, with a protocol-defined algorithm, most events generally recovered or resolved. Trastuzumab botidotin treatment had low incidences of pulmonary, hematologic, hepatic, and GI toxicities. CONCLUSION: Among patients with HER2-positive advanced BC previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane, trastuzumab botidotin resulted in significantly longer PFS than trastuzumab emtansine, with a distinct safety profile.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.