Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous efgartigimod with prednisone in moderate-to-severe pemphigus (ADDRESS): a global, phase III, randomised controlled, double-blind trial

In brief

Efgartigimod plus prednisone yields no extra remission benefit in pemphigus (35% vs 30%)

In a phase III trial of 222 adults with moderate-to-severe pemphigus, weekly subcutaneous efgartigimod combined with standard prednisone achieved complete remission on minimal steroids in 35% of patients, not meaningfully different from 30% with prednisone alone. The drug lowered IgG and autoantibody levels but did not improve disease scores, and safety was comparable.

Journal
The British journal of dermatology (Q1)
Published
11 September 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Pascal Joly, Dedee F Murrell, Yumi Aoyama, Frédéric Caux, Dipankar De, Marilena Flouri, et al.
PMID
42723554
DOI
10.1093/bjd/ljag199

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Dermatology (top studies of the week, 13 September 2026): Phase III RCT, biologic Fc fragment for pemphigus
  • Picked for Neonatology (top studies of the week, 13 September 2026): Phase III trial of efgartigimod in pemphigus

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF) are rare, chronic, potentially life-threatening, immunoglobulin (Ig)G-mediated, autoimmune skin and/or mucosal blistering diseases. Efgartigimod, a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment, blocks the neonatal Fc receptor, decreasing IgG recycling and reducing both healthy and pathogenic IgG autoantibody levels. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy, safety and impact of subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 (co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20) in conjunction with prednisone in the treatment of pemphigus. METHODS: Adult participants with newly diagnosed or relapsing moderate-to-severe pemphigus were recruited in this phase III, prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study (NCT04598451). Participants were randomised (2 : 1) to weekly subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 or placebo. Subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 2000 mg was administered on days 1 and 8, followed by 1000 mg weekly until complete remission on minimal prednisone therapy (CRmin) (≤ 10 mg daily). All participants received concomitant prednisone starting at 0.5 mg kg-1 daily. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with PV who achieved CRmin by week 30, while receiving minimal prednisone, for ≥ 8 weeks. Pharmacodynamics and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 222 participants (PV: n = 190; PF: n = 32) were randomised (subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20: n = 147; placebo: n = 75). The proportions of participants with PV achieving CRmin within 30 weeks were comparable between the subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 and placebo groups, with no statistically significant difference observed [44/124 (35.5%) vs. 20/66 (30.3%); P = 0.60; odds ratio 1.19 (95% confidence interval 0.60-2.41)]. Total prednisone consumption over time was comparable between groups. Subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 resulted in rapid reductions from baseline in total IgG and anti--desmoglein-1 and anti-desmoglein-3 autoantibody levels, but these did not translate to improvements in Pemphigus Disease Area Index scores. The rates of adverse events (AEs) in the subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 and placebo groups were 89.1% (n = 131/147) and 76.0% (n = 57/75), respectively; most were mild to moderate [serious AEs: 12.2% (n = 18/147) and 13.3% (n = 10/75), respectively]. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 in combination with systemic corticosteroids did not demonstrate clinical benefit over systemic corticosteroids alone in patients with moderate-to-severe pemphigus at 30 weeks, but it was well tolerated in this patient population.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.