Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials
- Journal
- Frontiers in oncology (Q2)
- Published
- 26 August 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Jing Xu, Lin Zhang, Wen-Ying Yang, Xiao-Jing Cai, Xiong Xiao
- PMID
- 42718730
- DOI
- 10.3389/fonc.2026.1837967
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Biochemistry (medical) (top studies of the week, 13 September 2026).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical value of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent ovarian cancer remains regimen-dependent and uncertain. We updated the evidence base and separated nonrandomized response evidence from randomized comparative evidence. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to 23 July 2026, supplemented by reference and citation searching. Eligible reports were peer-reviewed prospective phase II or III trials of an ICI-containing combination in adults with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Front-line, maintenance-only, ICI-monotherapy, retrospective, phase I-only, protocol-only, and mixed platinum-status cohorts without extractable resistant/refractory data were excluded. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) from compatible nonrandomized cohorts were synthesized as proportions using a logit random-effects model with Paule-Mandel variance estimation and Hartung-Knapp confidence intervals. Randomized hazard ratios were synthesized descriptively and were not pooled. RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible prospective reports were included, comprising 14 nonrandomized reports and 7 randomized trials. Of the 14 nonrandomized reports, 13 provided compatible confirmed response data for the pooled ORR analysis, yielding 112 objective responses among 490 participants and a pooled ORR of 21.9% (95% CI, 13.1%-34.3%; I² = 70.7%). The remaining nonrandomized report was retained for narrative synthesis only because it reported an unconfirmed response. Ten nonrandomized reports contributed 211 disease-control events among 354 participants, yielding a pooled DCR of 59.9% (95% CI, 46.4%-72.1%; I² = 71.7%). The seven randomized trials were summarized separately and were not pooled with the nonrandomized reports. KEYNOTE-B96 demonstrated improved progression-free survival (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.84) and overall survival (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97), whereas JAVELIN Ovarian 200, EORTC 1508, NRG-GY023, and AGO-OVAR 2.29 did not meet their primary efficacy objectives. CONCLUSIONS: ICI-based combinations show measurable but highly heterogeneous activity in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. The evidence does not support a uniform class effect: a survival benefit is established for pembrolizumab plus weekly paclitaxel in KEYNOTE-B96, whereas several other randomized strategies were negative. Future trials should prioritize regimen-specific validation, biomarker enrichment, and harmonized toxicity reporting.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.